<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Bidding Challenge E</title>
		<description>Comments for Bidding Challenge E at http://www.trumps.net.au , comment 1 to 8 out of 8 comments</description>
		<link>http://www.trumps.net.au</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 02:48:49 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.trumps.net.au/learning/what-should-i-bid/67-bidding-challenge-e#comment-17</link>
			<description>Law of total tricks says bid 4S -but given the balanced nature of the hand,maybe 3S-inviting game - justin</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:26:31 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.trumps.net.au/learning/what-should-i-bid/67-bidding-challenge-e#comment-16</link>
			<description>2S showing support in spades and a weak hand. - neilb</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 21:38:32 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.trumps.net.au/learning/what-should-i-bid/67-bidding-challenge-e#comment-14</link>
			<description>I'd play it safe with 3S, see what partner does. - Suzie</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 09:43:07 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.trumps.net.au/learning/what-should-i-bid/67-bidding-challenge-e#comment-8</link>
			<description>4S.  The hearts are well placed and not interested in slam. - Gordon</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 04:24:28 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.trumps.net.au/learning/what-should-i-bid/67-bidding-challenge-e#comment-7</link>
			<description>I'd vote for 4S with 10+ in spades and not vulnerable - idrog1</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 12:35:06 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.trumps.net.au/learning/what-should-i-bid/67-bidding-challenge-e#comment-6</link>
			<description>I'd vote for 4S with 10+ spades between us even though vulnerable :) - idrog1</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 12:33:34 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.trumps.net.au/learning/what-should-i-bid/67-bidding-challenge-e#comment-5</link>
			<description> two H winners and with 10 trumpbid 4S.  - Yong</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 09:51:39 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://www.trumps.net.au/learning/what-should-i-bid/67-bidding-challenge-e#comment-1</link>
			<description>With 5 card support, 8 total points and heart honours well placed, game is a good possibility. So 4 spades is the bid - a little weak for a 3 heart cue raise. - tony bond</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 03:56:58 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
